|
|
|
|
Teugn-HausenApril 19,1809
The battle of Teugn-Hausen was an attempt by the 3rd Austrian Korps under Fieldmarshal Lieutenant Hohenzollern to cut off French Marshal Davout's 3rd corps on it's way to link back up with the French army to the southwest. This was the culmination of a splitting of the French army by the Archduke Charles meant to catch Davout and defeat the army piecemeal. The Austrians deployed on top of a hill in the woods an attacked the French as the column passed in front of them. Unfortunately the Austrians could not support the men in the woods and the French managed to fight the Austrians largely in the woods which did not allow for the Austrian artillery superiority to bear upon them. The French managed to keep the wood and eventually the Austrians retired back on their original positions. The time it took to fight the battle and reform gave the French time to regain the initiative and Davout's force managed to eventually link up with the rest of the army. The ScenarioThe battle begins at 8 AM and plays until 2 PM (12 turns). At the end of 12 turns the winner is determined by the following
Historically this would have therefore been a complete French victory. This is consistent as the French goal is to safeguard III Corps to rejoin the army and the Austrian goal is to prevent that. Order of BattlePlease note that this is a small engagement so all of the organization are upgraded by one for the sake of the game - that is a unit is about 6 companies, a brigade replaces a division, a division a corps and the corps is the army.
AustriansIII Korps
Advance Guard
Lusignans Division
St.Juliens Division
Liechtensteins Brigade
Biebers Brigade
Reserve Artillery
FrenchIII Corps
4eme Division
Brigade Locencez
Brigade Destabenrath
2eme Division
Brigade Gilly
Brigade Grandeau
Brigade Barbanegre
* The 7eme Legere were actually part of Gudins 3rd division but for game purposes are included in 4th division This scenario kindly provided by Tod Creasey OTT [Tod_Creasey@oti.com] |
|
Contact me by clicking here Richard Holling |